Skip to main content

Motion Blur and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7

“We think our camera is broken and are wondering if we should take it back.” said a colleague at work, describing her family’s new camera.
“What’s making you think it’s broken? I asked.
“Almost all the pictures are blurry,” she said.
I immediately suspect camera motion and ask a few diagnostic questions. “Are you using the camera indoors or outdoors? Are you zooming in for tight close-ups? Are you taking action photos or staged portraits”
Basically, she answers, “Yes.”
“It’s probably camera-shake.” I offer.
“But it has image stabilization! Do you think you could take a look at it?”

I’m no expert, but in this situation, given that we both flounder at the low end of the clueless scale, I figured two heads would be better than one. I agreed to take a look at the camera, the camera manual, and some examples of the problem photos.

Figure 1 F3.2 Shutter Speed 1/4 ISO 200

A presumably stationary Christmas ornament. This is an example of motion blur caused by camera movement.

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7 seems to fall into the really-complicated-point-and-shoot-digital-camera category. The specifications for the camera seem pretty impressive. It’s a 6 megapixel camera but the thing that seemed the most amazing to me was the camera’s lens specification (Optical 12X zoom, f = 6 mm to 72 mm). To be honest, that last part didn’t seem so impressive to me because I didn’t know exactly what was being measured until I went on to read that f = 6 mm to 72 mm is equivalent to 36 mm to 432 mm in the world of 35mm film cameras.

I compared the lens specification for the Lumix to a lens I was familiar with. Sigma has a telephoto lens for 35mm cameras that’s supposed to be 18-200 mm. If I were to use it with my Canon digital Rebel, I’d have to take into account the camera’s sensor size and its placement in relation to the lens. I’ve learned that to get 35 mm camera equivalencies for the Rebel, I need to multiply the specified focal length of the lens by 1.6. The 35 mm camera equivalent for the Sigma lens paired with the Rebel works out to 28.8 – 320 mm.

So far, we’ve taken into account how ‘long’ the Lumix lens is, which I guess is another way to describe its powers of magnification. Sticking to the 35 mm camera equivalencies, we can say that the Lumix, at 432 mm is 112 mm longer than the Sigma lens. In other words, if I want to take surveillance photos of the anarchist in the parade, the Sigma lens will allow me to zoom in on the anarchist’s nose while the Lumix camera will allow me to count the nose hairs.

But there is kind of a trade-off associated with long lenses and it has to do with how much light can get into the lens to reach the sensor (formerly film). This is measured with another set of specifications that have to do with how wide a diaphragm at the back of the lens can be opened to let light in. Looking at the Lumix lens, I can see the aperture numbers written as 1: 2.8 - 3.3. The manual doesn’t really explain this nomenclature, but I think it means that at the short end of the lens’s focal length, the aperture is F2.8 (Where ‘F’ stands for aperture) and at the longer end it drops to F3.3. Suffice it to say, when considering aperture numbers, smaller is better (faster) and each larger increment on the aperture scale lets half as much light in. The Sigma lens is labeled with aperture data that looks like this: 1: 3.5 - 6.3. It looks to me, based on these numbers that the Lumix lens should be ‘faster’ even though it is ‘longer’.

One of the nice things about today’s digital cameras is their built in ability to keep track of the camera’s settings and embed this information into the picture’s digital file. I reviewed the settings for the pictures that were blurry, and in every case, the blurry photos in question showed aperture values wide open at F2.8, but the shutter speeds were still in the range of 1/5th to 1/20th of a second. Despite the relatively fast aperture (compared to the Sigma lens), the camera still had to choose long exposure times to allow enough light in to make pictures.

To get a practical idea of how shutter speed relates to stopping motion, I used the Lumix camera, a ferocious-windup-walking-Spark-Dino, a halogen work-lamp and a turntable to create the following sequence of pictures.

Figure 2 F6.3 Shutter Speed 1/5 ISO 100

Figure 3 F 6.3 Shutter Speed 1/8 ISO 100

The turntable is set at thirty-three and one third revolutions per minute. In retrospect, I probably should have set it slower. The sparking dino is towards the outside edge of the turntable, but he is not wound-up and consequently is not walking or sparking. In all cases, I attempt to trip the shutter when the sparking dino is closest to the camera lens. What seems clear at these shutter speeds is that I am nowhere close to stopping motion. Also, since the aperture is recorded as F 6.3, my analysis of the meaning of the cryptic markings on camera lenses above is flawed.

Figure 4 F 3.6 Shutter Speed 1/20 ISO 100

Figure 5 F 3.3 Shutter Speed 1/25 ISO 100

To get the shutter speed to be shorter, I made the aperture wider (a smaller number = faster), however, I soon reach the limits of the lens and actually end up underexposing figure four and five to achieve 1/25th of a second.

Figure 6 F 3.3 Shutter Speed 1/60 ISO 100

Figure 7 F 3.3 Shutter Speed 1/250 ISO 100

To achieve even higher shutter speeds, I ended up having to hold the halogen work-lamp increasingly ever closer to the subject.

I topped out at 1/250th of a second, but even then, I was unable to completely stop the motion produced by the sparking dino’s placement on the turntable.

Figure 8 F 3.3 Shutter Speed 1/250 ISO 100

Evidently, thirty-three or so revolutions per minute is conducive to movement that is generally faster than most of the motion one would encounter in a low- light portraiture situation. Generally, I feel pretty comfortable if my camera is showing me shutter speeds at 1/60th of a second or faster/shorter. Even so, I usually make a point of asking my subjects to hold still. Not only will there be motion from the subject, but unless one is using a tripod, there will likely be some movement from the camera operator pressing the shutter button.

Zooming in tight on the subject requires much more light (slower shutter speeds). Since the lens we are looking at is already stressed by low light situations, a tripod is essential. Also, giant clamps to hold the subjects head and limbs firmly in place should be seriously considered.

Finally, I checked the Lumix camera manual to find out about Optical Image Stabilization. This is what it said:

The stabilizer function may not be effective in the following cases.
- When there is a lot of jitter.
- When the zoom magnification is high.
- When taking pictures while following a moving subject.
- When the shutter speed becomes slower to take pictures indoors or in dark places.

Is it just me, or are those all the conditions that occur when you might want something like image stabilization to work? Presumably image stabilization works better when the subject is motionless and outside on a bright, sunny, cloudless day.

Finally, one other thing that I failed to account for when I took the sequence of experimental photos was the ISO setting (a measure of the camera’s sensitivity to light). It turns out that the ISO was evidently set at 100 for the manual mode. The camera itself is capable of being adjusted to ISO 400. Some modes don’t allow the user to choose the ISO, but where possible, it would be a good idea to bump it up to 400.

The camera isn’t broken.
Each lens has built in limitations.
To reduce blurred images:
Increase the ISO setting to 400 if possible
Use shutter preferred mode (instead of SIMPLE MODE) and set the shutter speed to 1/125 of a second or even a shorter fraction of a second if possible.
Use a tripod or brace your elbow(s) on a table or something that doesn’t move.
Open window shades, turn on lights, use the flash, or relocate to a brighter space.

Unanswered questions:
What does 1: 2.8 - 3.3 really mean?
What is the relationship between the focal length of a camera’s lens and the size of the camera’s sensor (film)? Based on the difference in the physical size of a lens’s diameter, aperture must be more than the physical measure of the lens’s diaphragm. What is aperture?


  1. I use this camera and it's been helpful reading this. Thank you!


Post a Comment

Popular Posts

John Day River: Thirty Mile Creek to Cottonwood Bridge

"Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse;"-Romans 1:20

"I'm not so sure about that, but whether or not we all make it through these rapids alive, I'm confident the grading criteria will be fair." - Scott

"Get ready to explore your world without boundaries." - Wilderness Systems Owners Manual

Sunrise found us on the outskirts of Wasco, high on the Columbia Plateau, our 3 vehicle convoy speeding through golden fields of wheat on toward Condon and then West to a 7:30 AM meeting with a rancher who would provide us a private launch site to the John Day river and also execute our car shuttle.

Startling verdant fields, free of the vestiges of irrigation, belied narratives of drought that punctuated the news. The fresh born morning, still cool to the senses, felt like the fledgling hours of a new creation.

The rancher…

Test Paddling the Tarpon 160 (finally)

The problem with 'objectivity' is that it's usually 'subjectivity' cleverly disguised as objectivity.
I've wanted the Tarpon 160 ever since I saw it sitting in the rack at the kayak shop. However, I'm trying to take the universal advice of the broad community of kayakers who suggest that choosing a kayak is a personal choice based on how a particular boat fits one's body and objectives, and so, going through the motions of due diligence, I've finally come to the day when I actually get to paddle my dream boat.
It doesn't escape my attention that I seem to have a Wilderness Systems' bias. The first kayak I ever sat in was their 12 foot plastic Pungo which delivered me down the SandyRiver without making me a candidate for the Darwin Awards. The first kayak I ever bought (so far the only kayak I ever bought) was their Tsunami 125 which has, over the last eight years, patiently taught me everything I know about kayaking except for that bit of advi…

Test Paddling the Thresher 140

Wilderness Systems has broadened their sit-on-top offerings this year with the introduction of the Thresher (this includes a 14 and 15.5 foot version). The Thresher seems designed to bridge a gap between overly stable, relatively slow fishing platforms and sleeker more touring-orientated craft, all for the sake of fisher-people who need to cover significant distances to reach their intended fishing locales, whether that's in the middle of a huge bay or out beyond the breakers in the open sea

The characteristics that make this boat a good fishing option, should also make it a killer expedition photography platform/beer barge. I knew my test trials wouldn't be complete until I auditioned this state of the art bid for kayak fishing supremacy.

I've probably been remiss for not highlighting this before, but the reason I've been able to rent and evaluate various sit-on-top kayaks is because of the reasonable and renter friendly policies of the Next Adventure team at the paddle…

Miller Island Expedition: Columbia River Ghost Cult

My brother Fred sent me a checklist of things he didn’t want to forget for our second attempt at a Miller Island Expedition.

Foil pans
Beer or whiskey/tequila
Bug spray
Ghost repellents

Scouting Miller Island from the Lewis and Clark Highway (Washington side of river)

“Ghost repellents?” I asked.

Well, it turns out that Fred had been doing some research and found an old article from American Anthropologist by Wm. Duncan Strong called The Occurrence and Wider Implications of a “Ghost Cult” on the Columbia River Suggested by Carvings in Wood, Bone and Stone. The article, written in 1945, revealed that bone carvings depicting figures with prominent rib cages, a symbol of death, were found in old cremation pits on Miller’s Island.

Excerpts from the article:

“It can be shown that among these peoples there was an old belief in the impending destruction and renewal of the world, when the dead would return…”

“One of the most striking features of Northwest Coast m…

TILIKUM CROSSING, Bridge of the People, Portland OR


I saw the comment in a social media forum - a private group for hikers. I was yet unaware that the group was a loose confederation of fairly opinionated if not quite warring factions. The comment seemed innocent enough. It was a veiled plea to start a civil debate about editing waterfalls. The gist of it was this, “...the smooth water effect looks very unnatural. Almost looks like it’s trying to trick folks who don’t have the opportunity to go and see waterfalls themselves.” As the post began to generate more and more comments, the ambiguity of “Almost looks like…” slowly became more explicit as in “ is intentionally deceiving people who have not seen the waterfall... Just curious to hear if anyone feels the same way.”
The “smooth water effect” refers to the silky, blurred look that happens to moving water in long-exposure photographs.

At about a hundred comments into the thread, the original poster had distilled his viewpoint to this: “It’s negative in my mind because it’s an inac…

Eagle Creek Fire Jumps Over the Columbia: Childless Adults Even More Thankful to be Childless.

The Columbia River Gorge 09/05/2017 at 3:00am (As viewed from the Cape Horn Viewpoint on SR 14. Phoca Rock visible in middle of river.)

The Columbia River Gorge 05/31/2010 (from Cape Horn Viewpoint)

I've aligned these images based on the positions of Phoca Rock and the navigational structure in the middle of the river to estimate what areas are burning.

When I arrived at the viewpoint, it seemed I had missed the explosive advance of the fire's front. Still, as the wind gusted, and photographers scrambled to secure their tripods, one or another tree or other combustible item would explode like a solar flare.

The smoke stung my eyes. The buffeting breeze reminded me of speeding through central Oregon on a 104 degree day with the windows down.

Whenever the breeze lagged, voluminous, billowing smoke would hang briefly, as if in collusion with the ravenous flames, attempting to cover their sins of gluttony.

Starting around 4:00am, I started receiving emails indicating that the fire had j…

IF I DON'T GET PAID, DOES THAT MAKE ME — PROMISCUOUS? : I Perform an Unsolicited Review of the Danuu WingMan Kayak Fishing Seat Accessory Pack

I carefully chose my kayak to be my ultimate photography platform, beer-barge, expedition capable, multi-tasking water-craft, and it has exceeded my expectations.

One thing I hadn’t foreseen, however, was my evolution as a fisherperson.  At first, pressured into fishing by my growing awareness of what I’ll term a sort of ‘karmic imbalance’…

…I soon began to experience brief bouts of not just ‘fishing’, but also ‘catching’, and the catching part turns out to be — really, really fun.

But much like photography, the activity of fishing soon suggests a plethora of accessories and additional tools that need to be juggled in the confines of the kayak cockpit. Obviously, there’s fishing poles and lures and baits and anchors that need to have their places — places where they can be easily and quickly acquired.
The manufacturer of my kayak (Wilderness Systems) is way ahead of me here. They’ve thoughtfully included something they call the SlideTrax Accessory System and of course, a molded cup-holde…


They say Native Americans carved petroglyphs at the base of Willamette Falls, an ancient fishing site. I’ve paddled up to the falls a couple of times to find the old markings, but always seem to miss them. The massive horseshoe-shaped falls are over a quarter mile wide and are blended in with concrete and steel industrial structures that make its natural configuration something of a puzzle.

I figured a fresh set of eyes would improve my chances of finding the petroglyphs, so I invited Karen, who had previously expressed an interest in learning to kayak. Karen and I are part of the same extended church family, but more like cousins who almost never visit each other. In the past, she has tried to kill me with a heavy piñata stick and also a spring roll (the spring roll wasn't really her fault). Having Karen along makes even the most pedestrian outing more like a life and death adventure — at least for me.

Smoke, presumably from California’s wildfires, interfered with the dawn and colo…


(Formerly, Used Home-made Solar Filter for Sale: Only Used Once!)

In the Pacific Northwest, I’ve become accustomed to spending many a meteor shower shivering in the dark beneath opaque cloud covers.
So there are clouds.
Then, as the media began hyping a once in a lifetime opportunity, the prospect of a million or so extra commuters on the road to Salem made a 99% solar eclipse sound pretty good.
So there’s traffic.
But Mr. and Mrs. P began helping me chip away at these objections until all that was left was the question of equipment.
I had access to two possible camera choices. A Panasonic point-and-shoot with a lens boasting a 600mm focal length (35mm equivalent) or a Canon digital DSLR /Sigma 70-300mm zoom lens combo. Because the Canon’s APS-C sensor has a crop factor of 1.6 the 35mm equivalent is approximately 480mm.  Neither of these  choices has enough ‘reach’ to create images in which the sun fills the frame, so I started giving extra credence to articles that encouraged NOT taking ph…