The problem with 'objectivity' is that it's usually 'subjectivity'
cleverly disguised as objectivity.
I've wanted the Tarpon 160 ever since I saw it sitting in
the rack at the kayak shop. However, I'm trying to take the universal advice of
the broad community of kayakers who suggest that choosing a kayak is a personal
choice based on how a particular boat fits one's body and objectives, and so,
going through the motions of due diligence, I've finally come to the day when I
actually get to paddle my dream boat.
It doesn't escape my attention that I seem to have a
Wilderness Systems' bias. The first kayak I ever sat in was their 12 foot
plastic Pungo which delivered me down the Sandy River
without making me a candidate for the Darwin Awards. The first kayak I ever
bought (so far the only kayak I ever bought) was their Tsunami 125 which has,
over the last eight years, patiently taught me everything I know about kayaking
except for that bit of advice from Bernadette
and Keith about paddling with your core and not your arms so much.
Mostly, my kayak acts as a platform and facilitator
for my photography, taking me to places where nature still looks pretty natural
for the most part. But as my expeditions become more ambitious, I find I need
more easily accessible storage space. I've also noticed that my 12.5 foot
Tsunami struggles to make headway over big water in the wind and chop of
inclement weather. Even in optimal conditions, even if I was not always pausing
to unwrap my camera and seek ideal shots, I can't seem to keep up with others
in their sleek longer boats.
Enter the Tarpon 160, touted as the fastest of the Tarpons
and the go-to reference when reviewers make speed comparisons, such as,
"The ACME Sting Ray isn't quite as fast as the Tarpon 160, but we've
slapped a couple of extra flush-mount fishing-pole-holders on this one to help
justify the steep price."
If form follows function, then the Tarpon's long slender
hull speaks about speed. But I'm not a hull designer, I realize, and I may be
confusing aerodynamic sexiness as a solution for a problem better suited to
hydraulic equations. Striving for objectivity, I go on to note differences I
think I see between the tarpon and the Trident Ultra 4.3. The bow of the Tarpon
seems pointier and streamlined, without the fast flared bulging that seemed
evident on the ultra. Does this mean that the Tarpon will poke through waves
instead of riding up over them? The Tarpon doesn't seem to have any
rocker...and if it's supposed to, then this one has lost it, its 16 foot length
of heavy plastic slowly collapsing over time. Perhaps the Tarpon 160 is testing
the balance between structural rigidity and weight.
The keeled ends of the kayak quickly transition to a
long flat belly with multi-chine sides.
Two long grooves, like negative-space rails, travel the
length of the flat belly, perhaps as a kind of novel keel substitute...or
perhaps a means to architecturally stiffen the hull.
Without the helpful Next Adventure's employee available to
help me unload the Tarpon, I quickly gain an appreciation for how heavy this
boat is. Without a traditional cockpit to stick a shoulder in, there doesn't
seem to be any balanced way a single individual can carry this behemoth. The
Tarpon 160 (with rudder) is listed at 79 pounds. If it was a bar with free
weights, it wouldn't be a problem, but this thing is 16 feet long and bulkier
than a log and something like a sail in the wind. I grab onto one side handle
and heft it thigh high while stumble-walking down the long boat ramp. Crap. I
wish I had my little sister here to carry it for me.
Originally, I had hoped to launch from Clackamette
Park and explore Willamette Falls ,
but when I got there, I did some rough calculations concerning the speed of the
water flowing past my intended launch point, my relative fitness, and the
number of fishermen lining the banks and their likely inclination to either
laugh or help if I should tip over. What I came up with was a scenario
analogous to Lucy and Ethel sitting at an assembly line trying to wrap passing chocolates.
So...Willamette
Park .
The thing about sitting in an unfamiliar kayak is the first
moment when you first lean a little bit and go "oh shit!" because you
almost tipped over right at the beginning...except, you don't tip over and
after a few more minutes, you get a feel for the boat, and then after that, you
have to try to turn over if you want
to turn over. If a person were to exit the kayak after the initial 'Oh
shit" moment, that person would conclude the kayak is unstable. That same
person might form a very different opinion if they endured, say, four more hours
or so.
Heading up river, the Tarpon demonstrated a pronounced sensitivity to current - that is, strong currents and eddies had their way with it, just like rapists have their...umm...O.K., that's probably an ill advised metaphor, but should serve to hint at the frustration I experienced at having my navigational intentions violated. As the river constricted around massive b
The umpteenth time I got turned sideways by roiling water, I determined to figure out the rigging for the rudder (something not available on any of my previous rentals) and eventually yanked the line that caused it to satisfyingly boink into place. With the rudder in play, there was an immediate welcome reduction in the ratio of corrective-directional paddle strokes to straight-ahead-power strokes. Kayak purists may frown on rudders, but I now suspect I'll be shelling out extra money to get one, whichever kayak I end up getting (They come in handy).
Immediately in front of the seat is a storage hatch with access to the open interior of the boat. There's another bigger hatch on the bow, also accessing the boat interior. There do not seem to be any bulkheads. Like the Tarpon 140, the 160 has a well placed cup holder. The crackers are multi-grain with generous portions of smoked
Both hatches are hinged. They open and close easily with
simple lever locks and I consider both of them easily accessible while
paddling.
Usually I worry about how I'm going to get gear into my
kayak. With the Tarpons, you need to start thinking about how you're going to
get your gear out of the kayak. Small items may slide the length of the boat.
Turning around in your seat reveals...
...a spacious tank well. On a Tarpon 160, that's almost enough room to hang a hammock.
On the second day of the new year, temperatures started to creep above freezing.
...and I forgot my paddling gloves.
So I had to stop at my new apartment.
A long straight stretch of river before the turn to Elk Rock
gave me plenty of time to test the Tarpons vaunted capacity for speed. It does
seem to glide along, but is it significantly faster than the Tarpon 140? It feels like it. But is it enough to make up
for what I perceive as decreased mobility? I'm not so sure.
The trees making up my west horizon, as seen by water. The
sun warns me twilight is coming. Time to turn around.
The Sellwood Bridge with the Portland
skyline in the background.
The Sellwood
Bridge as seen by water.
O.K. I did add the moon.
(We like the moon.)
In conclusion, the allure of the Tarpon 160 has diminished
for me somewhat. Up until now, I had never considered buying a rudder before.
In the case of the 160, I probably wouldn't buy it without one. It's possible I
don't have the technical skill to turn that big boat like it ought to be
turned, but until I do, it feels like too much has been sacrificed for the sake
of speed.
Still undecided, huh? I love the pictures of the frozen stuff. Super neat!
ReplyDelete